Why not offer [Trout Brook] station "naming rights" to the Midcoast Conservancy, seeking
their input on what the name should be?
It will cost us nothing to do so, and has already been noted, the Conservancy is a landowner on both sides of our track, and has been supportive of our plans.
Keep in mind that whatever promotion they might do that involves that "station" and its hiking area/trails is likely to mention that station name, at the very least as a geographic reference point, but also possibly as combination train ride
and hike. See for example this page:
https://www.midcoastconservancy.org/events/trout-brook-trails-volunteer-work-day/.
We have a [soon bigger] parking lot at Sheepscot that most days could accommodate any and all the hikers that might want to get to that area, and the Midcoast Conservancy parking lot at that site is relatively small.
One of our goals is to attempt to make the train more than just a "ride" and have it instead be a "means" to get to some event (at Alna Center, TOM [sawmill etc], and could also be the Conservancy/Preserve property.
It costs us nothing, and might bring us some benefits from offering the Conservancy station "naming rights".