Author Topic: Bell on #9  (Read 6575 times)

Ted Miles

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
Bell on #9
« on: December 03, 2014, 03:30:00 PM »
Folks,
        I was re-reading my old newsletters and was interested in the bell that is now on #9. It is reported that the bell was found on a local barn and that it fit right into the bell frame on the #9.

This leads me to think it was from one of the railway's four Portland Company built locomotives. They are #2,#3, #8, and #9.

Since the #8 went down the bank and was scrapped in place by souvenir hunters; it is my guess that the bell started life there.

Does anyone have anymore information on which locomotive the bell is from originally?

Ted Miles
WW&F Life Member

 

Stewart "Start" Rhine

  • Museum Member
  • Superintendent
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,034
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2014, 05:30:52 PM »
The bell is a Portland Company bell.  It was on a barn but came from a bouy (probably the channel marker type).  This can be confirmed by the clapper strike pattern which goes all the way around the inside of the bell.

Start 

john d Stone

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 428
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2014, 06:17:49 PM »
Well, the original W.W.&F. did have some pretty rough track......

Philip Marshall

  • Museum Member
  • Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 705
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2014, 06:46:41 PM »
So when did 9 lose her original bell? Was it missing already when Moneypenny and Ramsdell purchased her?

Ted Miles

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 387
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2014, 02:56:25 PM »
Philip,
         If you look in Two-Foot To Tidewater, there is a picture of the WW&F #9 loaded on a flat car for transportation down to Connecticut. The bell is gone in that picture.

There was an article in TRAINS about the locomotive and the pictures shown there show the locomotive without a bell. But bracket was still in place.

A further thought; is the bell bronze or steel?

Ted Miles
WW&F Member

Stewart "Start" Rhine

  • Museum Member
  • Superintendent
  • ********
  • Posts: 3,034
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2014, 03:18:23 PM »
It's bronze.

Philip Marshall

  • Museum Member
  • Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 705
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2014, 08:49:38 PM »
Hi Ted, Of course I have both of those on my bookshelf and didn't think to check the photos before posting! I suppose it only makes sense that Frank Winter would have stripped the bells and other "jewelry" off all the engines after 1934 to help pay the tax bill, sadly.

-Philip Marshall
« Last Edit: December 08, 2014, 06:22:28 AM by Philip Marshall »

john d Stone

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 428
    • View Profile
Re: Bell on #9
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2014, 09:16:37 PM »
Strangely enough, in "Narrow Gauge in the Sheepscot Valley, there are two photos taken in the shop building after shutdown. One of #3 and one of #9. They appear to have been taken by Moody on the same day. #3 still has her bell, while #9's is missing! Selective vandalism?