Author Topic: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!  (Read 19364 times)

Matthew Gustafson

  • Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaj5Rrtw948oLXGLaqgUmDA
Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« on: December 01, 2008, 05:29:33 PM »
I would love to see MNGM 2-4-4 #7 & #8 one day vist WW&F! who wants a four steamer photo train anyone?  ;D
« Last Edit: December 01, 2008, 05:35:54 PM by Matthew Gustafson »
Steam Department Volunteer at the Illinois Railway Museum.

Bill Piche

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2008, 01:19:03 AM »
Matt,

Speaking from a rough idea as to what runs and what doesn't run at MNG, you'd be more likely to see any combination of Monson 0-4-4T's #3/#4, and (or) #7. #8 needs FAR too much work (everything that is currently being done to #7 PLUS a problem with getting steam to the engineer's side cylinder) to be a plausible rebuild in any sort of near future scenario.

Like it has been said in other places on this forum, it all matters on how much money you have. All of the Maine two foot museums would love it if one of their members hit the $100 million Powerball jackpot and donated a chunk of that, but the fact is that the museums have to work with what they take in from tourists, grants, etc. The WW&F is a shining example of both volunteer loyalty (as seen in their annual income just from member donations) and shrewd business decisions. If funds aren't available and it isn't an immediate need (a thread I had read about 60# rail a while back is a good example), then it can wait.

I too would like to see 3, 4, or even all of the surviving Maine 2 footers together under steam sometime (wouldn't THAT make for a good smoke show), but don't hold your breath, it might be a while before it could happen.

Bill Piche
Fireman
MNGRR
Engineer/Fireman, MNGRR/WW&F/Essex
"Any day with steam is a good day." - me

Ed Lecuyer

  • Administrator
  • Superintendent
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,463
    • View Profile
    • wwfry.org
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2008, 08:01:13 AM »
It is also my understanding that some of the yard trackage at Sheepscot would need some adjusting to accommodate B&H #7 or #8. I'm not sure of the details.

There is already a great spirit of cooperation between the various 2ft museums. Monson #3 visited the WW&F on two separate occasions. One of those times was also when #10 was new to us - but had not been certified for operation. For that one weekend, there were 3 steamers at Sheepscot (3, 9 & 10!) Too bad only one (#3) was under steam and operational.

As Bill said, it all takes volunteer time and money.
Ed Lecuyer
Moderator, WW&F Forum

Matthew Gustafson

  • Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaj5Rrtw948oLXGLaqgUmDA
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2008, 08:05:15 AM »
There is already a great spirit of cooperation between the various 2ft museums. Monson #3 visited the WW&F on two separate occasions. One of those times was also when #10 was new to us - but had not been certified for operation. For that one weekend, there were 3 steamers at Sheepscot (3, 9 & 10!) Too bad only one (#3) was under steam and operational.
Was #3 from Sandy River or MNGM?  ???
« Last Edit: December 02, 2008, 08:38:56 AM by Ed Lecuyer »
Steam Department Volunteer at the Illinois Railway Museum.

Bill Piche

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2008, 08:18:23 AM »
#3 and #4 are from the Monson Railroad
Engineer/Fireman, MNGRR/WW&F/Essex
"Any day with steam is a good day." - me

Bill Piche

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2008, 08:33:07 AM »
...and are part of the Maine Narrow Gauge collection. #3 is currently leased to the Sandy River Museum.
Engineer/Fireman, MNGRR/WW&F/Essex
"Any day with steam is a good day." - me

John McNamara

  • Operating Volunteers
  • Supervisor
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,616
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2008, 11:05:11 AM »
Was #3 from Sandy River or MNGM?  ???

To elaborate a little, as stated in another post, #3 is an ex-Monson engine. At the time it visited the WW&F, MNGM was graciously loaning it to us for a couple of weekends.

Matthew Gustafson

  • Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaj5Rrtw948oLXGLaqgUmDA
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2008, 12:06:12 PM »
Oh okay. At least other 2 footers in Maine sometimes covers #9 & #10 when they are both down for repairs. :) 
Steam Department Volunteer at the Illinois Railway Museum.

Tom Casper

  • Museum Member
  • Hostler
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
    • View Profile
    • Sandy Ridge & Clear Lake Ry.
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2008, 12:41:33 PM »
Oh okay. At least other 2 footers in Maine sometimes covers #9 & #10 when they are both down for repairs. :) 
Matt,  #9 has not been up from repairs yet on the restored WW&F.  Sometime soon we all hope.

Tom C.
Later:
tom_srclry_com

Mike Fox

  • Museum Member
  • Empire Builder
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,698
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2008, 12:51:43 PM »
I believe the #'s 7 & 8 are too heavy for our yard track. Passing over the track once or twice might be one thing, but constant use over the coars of a day might lead to trouble. This discussion was had before someplace else. The meets would be limited to Alna Center. Now maybe later on down the road, the siding to the future turntable would be heavy enough to accomodate such heavy engines, and for our future #11.
Mike
Doing way too much to list...

Bill Piche

  • Museum Member
  • Fireman
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #10 on: December 02, 2008, 02:14:40 PM »
Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not a regular visitor to the WW&F (yet).

If memory serves, the main line at the station is 20#, the yard is 20#-30#, and the main line north of the water tank is 30# going up to 60# at the EOT.

The SR&RL & the B&H were running on 50#-56# rail by the end (or at least the SR&RL, I haven't read enough to know about the B&H rail yet), which was the heaviest outside of Edaville and what the MNG runs on.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2008, 03:06:16 PM by Bill Piche »
Engineer/Fireman, MNGRR/WW&F/Essex
"Any day with steam is a good day." - me

James Patten

  • Administrator
  • Superintendent
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,300
  • Loco for 6
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2008, 03:01:29 PM »
The main line is 30 or 33# for the first quarter mile.  Yard tracks are 20 or 30#.  Beyond the first quarter mile it goes up to 56/60.

Switches however might be the kicker.  I think yard switches at Sheepscot are all #8's.

Vincent "Lightning" LeRow

  • Museum Member
  • Hostler
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2008, 04:59:20 PM »
I think the museam should consider upgrading the main in this area to 60#

a personal preferance, and the leftover 33# can be reused to upgrade the 20#rail.
A spike saved is a spike earned.

Matthew Gustafson

  • Engineer
  • ****
  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
    • https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaj5Rrtw948oLXGLaqgUmDA
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2008, 05:01:05 PM »
Could we make the yard track heavier to support #7 & #8 if we have enongh money and supplies?  ??? ::) :)
Steam Department Volunteer at the Illinois Railway Museum.

Mike Fox

  • Museum Member
  • Empire Builder
  • ********
  • Posts: 5,698
    • View Profile
Re: Visting Maine 2 footers to the WW&F!
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2008, 07:36:21 PM »
Money, supplies and time.Relaying here would be simple compared to laying new track. But continuing north I think will take a bigger priority. It could possibly be done a little at a time. But then the transition joint would have to be moved. Good thought for the future though.
Mike
Doing way too much to list...