61
The Monson Blog / Monson's Unique Train Makeup
« on: September 22, 2011, 11:49:19 AM »
Monson’s Unique Train Makeup
Have you ever noticed that there are a lot of pictures of the Monson engines in the middle of a string of cars? Especially in the later years of the railroad? I have always wondered why and I have a theory.
It is well known that Superintendent Morrill was frequently badgered by the ICC to make modern improvements to the railroad. Moody mentioned it several times in the chapters on the Monson. “The Monson trainmen seemed to be content no matter how their train was made up”. However Moody may not have been aware of the ICC vs. Monson Railroad issues. The Monson trainmen may not have been too pleased! Morrill managed to stave off the ICC folks for years and made very few concessions, seemingly able to beat them at their own game. Harold Morrill was a very smart and shrewd business man!
As near as I can recall, ICC regulations at the time stated that two-track road crossings had to have either a signal man or some other device other than a sign for the double crossing, but not for one track. I may be in error here. I’m sure Allan Fisher could set us straight on that. The Monson yard had a run-around siding. But on pages 74, 92 and 125 of the Jones book there are pictures of the run-around cleanly cut to the north edge of Water Street. I own another picture which verifies the same on the south side of Water Street effectively making two stub end sidings out of what was a run-around.
My theory was that Morrill cut the siding (basically creating a one-track crossing) in order to beat the ICC….but it also meant that there was no way for the train crews to make up a train in the usual manner (locomotive in front) short of “poleing” especially if they had freight from the quarries. But “the Monson trainmen seemed to be content” so they just ran to the Jct as is.
So back to the Monson yard siding which was cut. Why else would they have disabled a operationally valuable section of track if it wasn’t for that? Anyone want to chime in??
Have you ever noticed that there are a lot of pictures of the Monson engines in the middle of a string of cars? Especially in the later years of the railroad? I have always wondered why and I have a theory.
It is well known that Superintendent Morrill was frequently badgered by the ICC to make modern improvements to the railroad. Moody mentioned it several times in the chapters on the Monson. “The Monson trainmen seemed to be content no matter how their train was made up”. However Moody may not have been aware of the ICC vs. Monson Railroad issues. The Monson trainmen may not have been too pleased! Morrill managed to stave off the ICC folks for years and made very few concessions, seemingly able to beat them at their own game. Harold Morrill was a very smart and shrewd business man!
As near as I can recall, ICC regulations at the time stated that two-track road crossings had to have either a signal man or some other device other than a sign for the double crossing, but not for one track. I may be in error here. I’m sure Allan Fisher could set us straight on that. The Monson yard had a run-around siding. But on pages 74, 92 and 125 of the Jones book there are pictures of the run-around cleanly cut to the north edge of Water Street. I own another picture which verifies the same on the south side of Water Street effectively making two stub end sidings out of what was a run-around.
My theory was that Morrill cut the siding (basically creating a one-track crossing) in order to beat the ICC….but it also meant that there was no way for the train crews to make up a train in the usual manner (locomotive in front) short of “poleing” especially if they had freight from the quarries. But “the Monson trainmen seemed to be content” so they just ran to the Jct as is.
So back to the Monson yard siding which was cut. Why else would they have disabled a operationally valuable section of track if it wasn’t for that? Anyone want to chime in??
