16
Museum Discussion / Re: Internet connectivity at Sheepscot
« on: August 14, 2024, 08:37:58 PM »
This Verizon blog page about "fixed wireless" shows a pole top antenna similar in shape to the one near Averill Rd. In the Verizon case the amplifier/controller boxes are close to the antenna, whereas the Averill Rd instance has the boxes below the high voltage wires.
https://www.verizon.com/about/blog/fixed-wireless-access
There is a benefit to having the control boxes below the high voltage wires as the 'normal' wireless maintenance crews may not need training to deal with high voltages, so those with lesser experience can be used. (read: pay them less), and the bucket trucks can have shorter booms (costs less).
The FCC database page says there are two candidates for FWA (fixed wireless) in the Alna area, Verizon and Redzone. I haven't seen anything that suggests who the Averill Rd setup belongs to.
https://www.verizon.com/about/blog/fixed-wireless-access
There is a benefit to having the control boxes below the high voltage wires as the 'normal' wireless maintenance crews may not need training to deal with high voltages, so those with lesser experience can be used. (read: pay them less), and the bucket trucks can have shorter booms (costs less).
The FCC database page says there are two candidates for FWA (fixed wireless) in the Alna area, Verizon and Redzone. I haven't seen anything that suggests who the Averill Rd setup belongs to.