Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bernie Perch

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 17
1
Work and Events / Re: Roundhouse construction.
« on: March 22, 2021, 11:09:54 PM »
The stalls in the shop are 1,2,3,4.  The stalls in the car barn should be 5,6,7 (any direction).  The stalls in the roundhouse should be 8, 9, 10 (any direction).  If the speeder stall is added to the carbarn it should be adjusted accordingly.  With this system, stalls would not need clarification.  When someone says go to stall 6, one immediately knows it is the center stall of the carbarn without any explanation needed.

Bernie

2
The Original W&Q and WW&F: 1894-1933 / Re: FS&K - Wellman Map
« on: March 13, 2021, 11:38:36 AM »
Some or most of the field notes for the surveying of the FS&K are in the WW&FRy Museum archives.

Bernie

3
US Two Footers / Re: 1880s and 1890s 2 foot gauge porter question
« on: December 29, 2020, 03:59:39 PM »
It is possible they built a two foot locomotive to that exact design, but the problem is that with the locomotives you pictured, the firebox was between the frame members.  If you were to go to two foot with the exact design, the firebox would be too narrow.  When going to two foot gauge or 20" gauge as the existing locomotives in Arizona, the firebox was put behind the drivers so it could be wide enough.  If you are contemplating building a two foot locomotive to that exact design, it could be possibly be fired with oil or gas, but no solid fuels.  Porter built some construction locomotives to two foot gauge with the firebox over the rear drivers but it was resting on top of the frame and the overall locomotive was rather tall looking, not at all like the design you mentioned.  I corresponded with an individual that I have lost contact with who had a boiler from one of these locomotives with the builder's plate intact.  I believe he was going to build a locomotive with parts scrounged from a wreck site of an identical locomotive.  I wonder how far he got.

Bernie

4
Work and Events / Re: Coach 9 - Official Work Thread
« on: February 27, 2020, 11:07:53 AM »
Harold,

I am amazed at how you attack your projects.  Do you have time to eat and sleep?  The WW&F is blessed to have you as one of the amazing volunteers that are recreating the best part of the "good olde days" in Maine.  I wonder if in a previous life you worked for one of the car builders that made some of the varnish for the original two footers.

Bernie

5
Volunteers / Re: January 2020 Work Reports
« on: January 08, 2020, 02:09:26 PM »
I am curious as to what is being moved and will the current archives rooms be used for something else?  I spend the work weekends doing caption work on the photo albums and wonder if this material will be accessible.

Bernie

6
Work and Events / Re: NOV. 2 - WORK-EVENT- ROCK THE MOUNTAIN!
« on: October 19, 2019, 11:52:09 AM »
How come work has stopped in Albion?

Bernie

7
Museum Discussion / Re: Reflections on 30 Years of the WW&F
« on: August 14, 2019, 08:49:33 AM »
Ten years from now, someone will be referring to now as "the good olde days".  I do feel what Steve is referring to.  At one time the railroad was quaint.  Now it is starting to become "big time".

Bernie

8
Work and Events / Re: Eames Train Brakes - Official Work Thread
« on: June 28, 2019, 05:31:46 PM »
You guys are taking this to a mind bogglingly higher level.  I am in awe.

Bernie

9
Work and Events / Re: Coach 9 - Official Work Thread
« on: June 03, 2019, 12:37:30 PM »
Harold,

I am just blown away by your work.  It is difficult to imagine all the hours you have in your patterns.

Bernie

10
Museum Discussion / Re: Useful relics at Portland Co?
« on: April 10, 2019, 11:52:32 AM »
Wasn't there some sort of crane between the turntable and the coal shed in Wiscasset?

Bernie

11
I rarely enter into these "expansion conversations" but I am going to enter my two cents.  When the railroad reaches 218 it will be about three miles long.  For the average tourist, especially with children, that is more than enough of a train ride.  Even though I understand why the railroad is expanding north to escape federal oversight, I always felt it was the wrong direction.  To go north beyond 218 in my mind is a waste.  It would require expensive crossing gates, expensive road crossing (thick boards would not suffice here), and would be limited to the next crossing.  Beyond that would require another major crossing which would require the road to be raised and the fill replaced beyond that.  All this would add another five minutes to the trip (both directions included).  What would the attraction be beyond 218--more trees and a field or two?  If there was a resort or tourist attraction to be reached which would produce more ridership, then I would feel differently.

I have heard stirrings of expansion southward.  There are houses and 218 in the way with all the problems mentioned above with crossings, but to me would be the sensible way to go.  Theoretically, when the railroad reached Wiscasset, with proper parking and promotion, the passenger numbers could greatly expand.  There would be no need to build a trestle or have a yard where the original was located.  Just put the tracks west of the current wide gauge ones.  There would have to be a little filling on the mud flats with its attendant permits, but considering what the railroad has done up to now, it isn't insurmountable. 

 Looking forward to SWW and all the progress since last fall.

Bernie

12
You should find a way to arrange to get more copies and have them sold in the gift shop.

Bernie

13
Work and Events / Re: Trout Brook Bridge - Official Work Thread
« on: September 20, 2018, 11:23:27 AM »
Have the Covered Bridge people, the people who originally reconstructed the bridge, and anyone who originally "saved" any part of the bridge commented about what has happened to it?

Bernie

14
Work and Events / Re: Trout Brook Bridge - Official Work Thread
« on: September 17, 2018, 11:37:32 AM »
Mike,

Thanx for your answer.  When I get up there for FWW, I will check it out.

Bern

15
Work and Events / Re: Trout Brook Bridge - Official Work Thread
« on: September 16, 2018, 10:19:32 PM »
I have a question about Trout Brook unrelated to the current bridge project.  All the photos show the brook at very low water levels.  When the Mason's wreck occurred, locomotive #4 landed in fairly deep water at least five or more feet deeper than the current level.  Why was the water so deep?  It doesn't appear to be a high flood level and seems quite still.  Was there a dam further down stream?

Bernie

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 17