W.W.&F. Discussion Forum
July 24, 2017, 05:30:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Notice: Car 67, where are you?
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Monson 3 and 4 in Portland  (Read 2738 times)
Brendan Barry
Museum Member
Engineer
****
Posts: 672


View Profile
« on: November 05, 2015, 05:17:26 AM »

Tuesday Monson number 3 was delivered to Portland to be used for Polar Express this Christmas and Monson number 4 was placed back in the museum for display. I understand number 3 will head back to the Sandy River in Phillips this summer.

Three arriving and being unloaded.
 












Four outside the engine house.



Three and four posed for pictures.













The engines were then switched out and four was trucked across the parking lot to the museum building.









Four just unloaded from the truck at the museum door.

Logged
Ira Schreiber
Museum Member
Dispatcher
*****
Posts: 1,023

Life Member


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2015, 07:27:06 PM »

A great photo essay. Thanks.
Logged
Philip Marshall
Museum Member
Fireman
****
Posts: 457


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2015, 08:00:43 PM »

Great photos, Brendan! It's so nice to see Monson 3 and 4 together again.

It's apparent that Number 4 really is slightly bigger than Number 3, not withstanding Moody's claim that he could never tell them apart except by counting the number of steps on the cab. Smiley

Logged
Stewart "Start" Rhine
Museum Member
Trainmaster
*******
Posts: 2,684


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2015, 09:24:22 PM »

Nice pics B.

#3 looks good with the aluminum lettering and no markers, like it looked when in service on the Monson.
Logged
James Patten
Wearer of Too Many Hats
Global Moderator
Trainmaster
*****
Posts: 2,655


Loco for 6


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2015, 10:37:44 PM »

And NO brass bands!
Logged
Philip Marshall
Museum Member
Fireman
****
Posts: 457


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2015, 10:42:45 PM »

And NO brass bands!

Yes!
Logged
Wayne Laepple
Museum Member
Dispatcher
*****
Posts: 1,223


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2015, 10:46:03 PM »

I prefer an orchestra to a brass band anytime......
Logged
Mike Arnold
Museum Member
Flagman
*
Posts: 29



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2015, 03:41:25 AM »

Is it me but she had brass bands longer then without? I know it's not original but it does take away from the Atwood/Blount Edaville look that saved the locomotives. Something has to be saved from the edaville days of what it was not what it has become. That railroad gave me my love for the two footers. When I worked for F Nelson's brother and niece I use to hear so many stories and they revoled around Edaville. The 3 looks amazing but missing thoes brass bands she just looks odd.
Mike
Logged

United States Merchant Marine.
Cadet at NY Maritime College
Philip Marshall
Museum Member
Fireman
****
Posts: 457


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2015, 04:29:00 AM »

Is it me but she had brass bands longer then without?

In numerical terms I think you are correct. I wasn't alive then, but from photos I've seen the brass bands show up sometime in the mid-1950s under Nelson Blount. In fact, photos of the move of B&M 2-6-0 No. 1455 to Edaville in 1956 show No. 3 in brass bands in front of the enginehouse, which is pretty definitive.

That makes at least 60 years in brass bands, which is as long as the Monson RR itself was in operation.
Logged
Bernie Perch
Museum Member
Hostler
***
Posts: 211



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2015, 12:59:06 PM »

I notice that the top of #3's steam dome is missing its top.  Is there any reason for that.  It looks unfinished.

Bernie
Logged
Ed Lecuyer
Moderator, WW&F Forum
Administrator
Supervisor
*****
Posts: 1,742



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2015, 05:45:09 PM »

As far as brass bands go, I prefer the more inclusive term "wind ensemble."

I'm not a member of Maine Narrow Gauge so my opinion doesn't really matter - but I think they made the right call to restore #3 to its Monson appearance. They are, after all, the Maine Narrow Gauge Museum, and not the Edaville Railroad museum (or a Atwood-Blount tribute band.)

I notice that the top of #3's steam dome is missing its top.  Is there any reason for that.  It looks unfinished.

I think I read elsewhere that it is off pending the FRA inspection, then it will be reinstalled.
Logged

Ed Lecuyer
Moderator, WW&F Forum
Bernie Perch
Museum Member
Hostler
***
Posts: 211



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2015, 08:47:09 PM »

Ed,

Thanx.  That makes sense and I should have realized that because I have been around for FRA inspections.

Bern
Logged
Tom Casper
Museum Member
Brakeman
***
Posts: 161


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2015, 12:44:09 AM »

Three passed her FRA inspection and is ready to go for their Polar Express days.

Tom C.
Logged

Later:
tom_srclry_com
Cliff Olson
Museum Member
Baggageman
**
Posts: 108


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2015, 02:41:21 PM »

I'm with James and Ed on the lack of brass bands on #3.  Also pleased that #4, as well as #3, now has no fake pilot.  The Monson lives!
Cliff Olson
(co-owner, Monson depot)
Logged
Bill Sample
Museum Member
Hostler
***
Posts: 281


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2015, 06:03:35 PM »

No brass bands and no GIANT NUMBER.  The nice almost head-on shot diminshed those effects on #4.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!